عنوان مقاله [English]
The pregnancy and birth process are important because they have directly been concerned with childhood health. The purpose of this research was to investigate the relationship between Apgar score and motor proficiency (gross motor skills) in 6-year-oldchildren in Bardaskan city. This is a descriptive-correlational study in which the statistical population included all the children born in Valiasser hospital in Bardaskan city in 2007. The statistical sample were selected in a purposeful and convenient manner (120 people including 60 boys and 60 girls). When the apgar scale data were recorded, Bruininks - Oseretsky test of motor proficiency were applied to evaluate gross motor skills. Research data were analyzed using spss 20 software and Pearson correlation coefficient. The results showed that there is no significant relationship between apgar score and gross motor skills. Based on the Pearson’s correlation results, it seems that the Apgar score may not be considered as a predictor for gross motor skills in this age.
10. Deitz J C, Crowe T K. Harris S R. (1987). Relationship Between Infant Neuromotor Assessment and Preschool Motor Measures. Journal of the americanphysical therapy association, 67(1): 17-14.
11. Drage JS, Kennedy C, Berendes H, Schwarz B K, Weiss W. (1996). The Apgar score as an index of infant morbidity: a report from the Collaborative Study of Cerebral Palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 8: 141-148.
12. Ehrenstein V. (2009). Association of Apgar scores with death and neurologic disability. Clinical Epidemiology, 1: 45–53.
13. Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Grijota M, NielsenG L, Kenneth J Rothman K J, Sorensen H T. (2009). Association of Apgar score at five minutes with long-term neurologic disability and cognitive function in a prevalence study of Danish conscripts. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 9: 9-14.
14. Erkkola R. (1979). The physical work capacity of the expectant mother and it's effect on pregnancy, Labour and the newborn. Int J Gynecol Obestet, 14: 153-159.
15. Grünebaum A, McCullough LB, Sapra KJ, Brent RL, Levene MI, Arabin B, Chervenak FA. (2013). Apgar score of 0 at 5 minutes and neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction in relation to birth setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 209(4): 1-6.
16. Hegyi T, Carbone T, Anwar M. (1998). The apgar score and its components in the preterm infant. Pediatrics, 101: 77-81.
17. Heywood K, Getehel N. (2005). Life span motor development; 4th ed, p.16.
18. Honzik MP, Hutchings JJ, Burnip SR. (1965). Birth record assessments and test performance at 8 months. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 109: 416-426.
19. Iliodromiti S, Mackay D F, Smith G C S, Pell J P, Scott M Nelson. (2014). Apgar score and the risk of cause-specific infant mortality: a population-based cohort study. Elsevier Ltd, 384(9956): 1749–1755.
20. Rosenblith J. (1984). Prognostic value of behavioral assess-ments of neonates. Biologia Neonatorum, 6: 76-103.
21. Ruth VJ, Raivio KO. (1988). Prenatal brain damage: Predictive value of metabolic acidosis and the apgar score. Br Med J, 297: 24-7.
22. Rüdiger M, Konstantelos D. (2015). Apgar score and risk of cause-specific infant mortality. Elsevier Ltd, 385(9967): 505–506.
24. Salustiano E, CaMpos J, IBidi S, Ruano R, Zugai M. (2012). Low Apgar scores at 5 minutes in a low risk population: maternal and obstetrical factors and postnatal outcome. Rev Assoc Med Bras, 58(5): 587-593.
27. Stuart A, Otterblad Olausson P, Källen K. (2011). Apgar Scores at 5 Minutes After Birth in Relation to School Performance at 16 Years of Age. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 118 (2): 201-208.
28. Veronesi S. Panzani AM, Faustini BA. (2009). Rota an Apgar scoring system for routine assessment of newborn puppy viability and short-term survival prognosis Theriogenology, 72: 401–407.