بررسی ارتباط بین وضعیت واقعی با برآورد ذهنی آمادگی جسمانی در مردان ۱۸ تا ۶۰ ساله

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی Released under (CC BY-NC 4.0) license I Open Access I


1 گروه فیزیولوژی ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

2 استاد فیزیولوژی ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

3 استادیار فیزیولوژی ورزشی، پژوهشگاه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، تهران، ایران

4 دکتری فیزیولوژی ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران


هدف از انجام پژوهش حاضر بررسی ارتباط بین برآورد ذهنی آمادگی جسمانی با وضعیت واقعی در مردان ۱۸ تا ۶۰ ساله شهرستان رشت بود. روش پژوهش حاضر از نوع همبستگی می‌باشد که به شیوه پیمایشی و میدانی انجام شد؛ از میان جامعه آماری مورد نظر 384 مرد شهرستان رشت با میانگین سنی 8/11±21/38 سال و شاخص توده بدن 99/3±38/26 کیلوگرم بر مترمربع به‌صورت نمونه‌گیری تصادفی به روش خوشه‌ای انتخاب شدند. فاکتورهای آمادگی جسمانی شامل وزن، قد، چربی زیرپوستی، استقامت قلبی- تنفسی، قدرت پنجه‌های دست، انعطاف‌پذیری تنه با استفاده از آزمون‌ها و روش‌های استاندارد اندازه-گیری شد. برآورد ذهنی از آمادگی جسمانی نیز با استفاده از پرسشنامه اصلاح‌شده دلیگنرس و همکاران سنجیده شد. برای تعیین روابط بین برخی از متغیرهای تحقیق از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون استفاده شد. داده با استفاده از نرم‌افزار spss نسخه 23 مورد تجزیه‌وتحلیل قرار گرفتند. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که بین وضعیت واقعی و برآورد ذهنی در استقامت قلبی- تنفسی (16/0=r، 031/0=p)، انعطاف‌پذیری عضلات تنه (28/0=r، 001/0=p) ارتباط مثبت و معنی‌داری، در ترکیب بدن (43/0- =r، 001/0=p) ارتباط معکوس و معنادار و در قدرت عضلانی، ارتباط غیرمعنادار (11/0=r، 38/0=p) وجود دارد. احتمالاً افراد زمانی می‌توانند برآورد ذهنی درست و دقیقی از وضعیت آمادگی جسمانی خود داشته باشند که در فعالیت‌های بدنی منظم شرکت کرده باشند و تغییرات حاصله از آن را در وضعیت آمادگی جسمانی خود مشاهده کنند.



عنوان مقاله [English]

The Relationship Between Real and Self-perception of Physical Fitness in Men 18-60 Years Old

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ehsan Safari Torbati 1
  • Hamid Mohebbi 2
  • Hadi Rohani 3
  • Abuzar Jourbonian 4
1 Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht. Iran
2 Professor of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
3 Assistant Professor in Exercise Physiology, Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, Sport Science Research Institute, Tehran, Iran
4 PhD of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between real and self-perception of physical fitness in men 18-60 years old in Rasht. The method of this research is correlational, conducted in a survey and field study. 384 male of Rasht city population with mean age of 38.2 ± 11.8 years and a body mass index of 26.4 ± 4.0 kg/m2 were randomly selected by cluster sampling. In this research, information was analyzed on two levels of descriptive and inferential statistics. Fitness factors including weight, height, subcutaneous fat, cardio-respiratory endurance, handgrip strength, and trunk flexibility were measured using standard tests and methods. Self-perception of physical fitness was measured using modified Delignières et al questionnaire. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between variables. Data were analyzed using SPSS 23.0. The results of this study showed that there was a significantly positive correlation between real and self-perception of cardio-respiratory endurance (r=0.16, p =0.031), trunk flexibility (r=0.28, p=0.001), a significantly negative correlation for body composition (r=-0.43, p= 0.001), and no significant correlation for muscle strength (r=0.11, p = 0.38). In general, it seems that people can accurately self-perceive their physical fitness status when by taking into regular physical activity and see actual changes in their physical fitness status.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Physical fitness
  • Self-Perception
  • Men
1. Kaasalainen KS, Kasila K, Villberg J, Komulainen J, Poskiparta M. A cross-sectional study of low physical fitness, self-rated fitness and psychosocial factors in a
sample of Finnish 18-to 64-year-old men. BMC public health. 2013;13(1):1113.
2.Kaasalainen KS, Kasila K, Komulainen J, Malvela M, Poskiparta M. Readiness for health behavior changes among low fitness men in a Finnish health promotion campaign. Health promotion international. 2015;31(4):827-38.
3. Biddle S. Physical activity. Health Psychology. 2010:47.
4. Morgan WP. Physical activity and mental health: Taylor & Francis; 2013.
5. Landers DM, Arent SM. Physical activity and mental health. Handbook of sport psychology. 2007;2:740-65.
6. Leith LM. Foundations of exercise and mental health: Fitness Information Technology; 2010.
7. Biddle SJ, Fox K, Boutcher S. Physical activity and psychological well-being: Routledge; 2003.
8. Schibye B, Hansen A, Søgaard K, Christensen H. Aerobic power and muscle strength among young and elderly workers with and without physically demanding work tasks. Applied Ergonomics. 2001;32(5):425-31.
9. Jürimäe T, Saar M. Self-perceived and actual indicators of motor abilities in children and adolescents. Perceptual and motor skills. 2003;97(3):862-6.
10. Huotari P, Sääkslahti A, Watt A. Associations between the self-estimated and actual physical fitness scores of Finnish Grade 6 students. Facta Universitatis: Series Physical Education and Sport. 2009;7(1):27-36.
11. Corder K, van Sluijs EM, Goodyer I, Ridgway CL, Steele
RM, Bamber D, et al. Physical activity awareness of British adolescents. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. 2011;165(7):603-9.
12. Rubín L, Suchomel A, Cuberek R, Dušková L, Tláskalová M. Self-assessment of physical fitness in adolescents. 2017.
13. Jensen KG, Rosthøj S, Linneberg A, Aadahl M. The Association Between Self-Rated Fitness and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Adults. International journal of sports medicine. 2018.
14. Presnell K, Bearman SK, Stice E. Risk factors for body dissatisfaction in adolescent boys and girls: A prospective study. International Journal of eating disorders. 2004;36(4):389-401.
15. Ahrberg M, Trojca D, Nasrawi N, Vocks S. Body image disturbance in binge eating disorder: A review. European Eating Disorders Review. 2۰۱۱ ; ۱9 ( 5 :) - 375 ۸۱ .
16. Delignières D, Marcellini A, Brisswalter J, Legros P. Self-perception of fitness and personality traits. Perceptual and motor Skills. 1994;78(3):843-51.
17. Li F, Wilkens LR, Novotny R, Fialkowski MK, Paulino YC, Nelson R, et al. Anthropometric measurement standardization in the US‐affiliated pacific: Report from the Children's Healthy Living Program. American Journal of Human Biology. 2016;28(3):364-71.
18. Meeuwsen S, Horgan G, Elia M. The relationship between BMI and percent body fat, measured by bioelectrical impedance, in a large adult sample is curvilinear and influenced by age and sex. Clinical nutrition. 2010;29(5):560-6.
19. Swainson MG, Batterham AM, Tsakirides C, Rutherford ZH, Hind K. Prediction of whole-body fat percentage and visceral adipose tissue mass from five anthropometric variables. PloS one. 2017;12(5):e0177175.
20. Ortega FB, Sui X, Lavie CJ, Blair SN, editors. Body mass index, the most widely used but also widely criticized index: would a criterion standard measure of total body fat be a better predictor of cardiovascular disease mortality? Mayo Clinic Proceedings; 2016: Elsevier.
21. Weiglein L, Herrick J, Kirk S, Kirk EP. The 1-mile walk test is a valid predictor of VO2max and is a reliable alternative fitness test to the 1.5-mile run in US Air Force males. Military Medicine. 2011;176(6):669-73.
22. Howley ET, Thompson D. Fitness Professional's Handbook 7th Edition: Human Kinetics; 2016.
23. Mikkelsson L, Kaprio J, Kautiainen H, Kujala UM, Nupponen H. Associations between self‐estimated and measured physical fitness among 40‐year‐old men and women. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2005;15(5):329-35.
24. Poux KN, Fry MD. Athletes’ perceptions of their team motivational climate, career exploration and engagement, and athletic identity. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology. 2015;9(4):360-72.
25. Lamb K, Haworth W. Self‐Perceived Fitness Amongst Adolescent Schoolboys. European Journal of Physical Education. 1998;3(2):167-77.
26. Taylor AH ,Fox KR. Effectiveness of a primary care exercise referral intervention for changing physical self-perceptions over 9 months. Health Psychology. 2005;24(1):11.
27. Lindwall M, Hassmén P. The role of exercise and gender for physical self‐perceptions and importance ratings in Swedish university students. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2004;14(6):373-80.
28. Roberts GC, Hall HK, Jackson SA, Kimiecik JC, Tonymon P. Implicit theories of achievement and the sport experience: effect of goal orientations on achievement strategies and perspectives. Perceptual and motor skills. 1995;81(1):219-24.
29. Dishman RK. Physical activity and public health: mental health. Quest. 1995;47(3):362-85.
30. Furnham A, Titman P, Sleeman E. Perception of female body shapes as a function of exercise. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1994;9(2):335.
31. Paeratakul S, White MA, Williamson DA, Ryan DH, Bray GA. Sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and BMI in relation to self‐perception of overweight. Obesity research. 2002;10(5):345-50.